eatingRD.com Food. Fitness. Nutrition. Life!

March 19, 2010

fat loading for endurance athletes

Filed under: Sports Nutrition — Kristen :) @ 8:06 am

Happy Friday! I went to 6am spin this morning, and it was a super sweat fest!  I usually don’t have time to shower afterwards, so hopefully I won’t be too smelly 🙂

Let’s take a look at fat-loading for this Fuel Your Fitness topic . . .  

While most that engage in endurance-type activities have known time and time again that carbohydrates are the body’s preferred energy source for performance, there have been some questions regarding fat-loading.  Fat is a substantial energy source, and if the body can adapt to utilize this source efficiently, it has been questioned if glycogen stores can be spared and endurance capacity increased.

The amount of energy stored as fat is in the range of 100-130,000 kcals where as total glycogen stores only total to about 2,000 kcals!

Carbohydrate is still a great energy source that is quick and efficient, although used up pretty darn quickly.  If there is not a substantial amount stored in the muscle and a little in the liver, when the blood glucose supply dwindles down in the latter stages of events without adequate fueling, your s*!t out of luck and hit the wall or bonk.

Fat oxidation is predominant in low to moderate intensity activities, but as the intensity increases carbohydrate becomes the preferred energy source and lipolysis decreases.  ATP (adenosine triphosphate) is the body’s main energy source for activity.  Only so much is made at one time and the body has to continually replenish.  More ATP can be made from carbohydrate than from fat, especially at high intensities when ATP breakdown is too fast to be match by the formation by fatty acids.

Endurance training actually also increases one’s capacity to utilize and store fat intramuscularly for energy, so one would think that fat loading could be a way to increase endurance performance, but the research hasn’t shown beneficial results . . .

  • Overall while increasing one’s fat content in the diet has shown to increase fat oxidation in both short and long term loading regimens, there hasn’t been significant results seen in athletic performance in many studies.
  • Even fat adaptation in ultra-endurance events (~65% VO2 Max, lasting longer than 4 hours) failed to show a statistically significant performance benefit (Carey AL, 2001).

Other things to consider . . .

  • A high fat diet (60-70% of calories) can be difficult to maintain and can also present some cardiovascular health issues depending on the type of fat consumed.  On another note about fat, there is actually some confuting evidence against this.  Emily has some great posts on the Big Fat Question, and even shows that saturated fat may not be the only picture in heart disease.
  • Increased RPEs (ratings of perceived exertion), along with lethargy and irritability, can be a side effect and of course is not good for performance or friends 🙂
  • Intense training without adequate carbohydrate also poses the risk of immune suppression and illness. Carbohydrate consumed during intense activity helps decrease stress hormones like cortisol and limits some of the exercise-induced immune suppression (Nieman, DC., 2007).
  • One study (Havemann L, 2006) found fat adaptation/carbohydrate restoration had no effect on overall time trial performance but compromised the ability of well-trained cyclists to perform 1 km sprints during the time trial. Even during longer, moderate-type activities, athletes need that edge and intensity to power through hills or sprint to the finish, and carbohydrates are what supply that energy.

Fat is still an important component in anyone’s diet, including athletes, and I believe it’s always good to go for balance and make sure to get 20-35% of calories from a variety of healthy sources of fat in the diet.

Overall, even though increasing fat adaptation may seem promising and it sure would make sense to be, it doesn’t equal performance benefits and is especially not beneficial for endurance athletes.

Any other thoughts?

~~~~

This weekend looks like it will be pretty packed already!  Tonight we are attending an Art Exhibition and Benefit where our friend’s art work will be featured for the first time.  Saturday I hope to get errands and random stuff done, and then it’s the SwankyRD‘s BIRTHDAY PARTY!!!  We’re going cosmic bowling baby!  And Sunday I hope to get a  50 miler in and hope I don’t keel over!

How has your activity shaped up this week? Many of you are pretty good at ‘just goin’ for it’ when it comes to fitness and also know when it’s a good time to take a rest, which is awesome!  It’s also important to understand that we ALL have down fitness days/weeks which is okay, and it’s never too late to jump back on the wagon to health.

  • Sunday — Body Pump weight sesh
  • Monday — Rest
  • Tuesday — Rode to work 32 miles
  • Wednesday — Rest
  • Thursday — Abs, well I was going to go to body pump, but wanted to join some of Chris’ work friends as a farewell dinner for one of his co-workers, but it turned out to be a ‘boys only’ event and I didn’t go to the gym so I could make it : / Thanks a lot!
  • Friday — Early morning spin
  • Saturday — Rest
  • Sunday — 50 miler!  go for it!

As far as my training goes, I can tell a noticeable difference in strength and the definition of my quads!  This is completely a new thing for me, especially being a dancer, but I enjoy it and it’s something exciting to strive for 🙂  I’d like to post a before and after picture, but I’m already 6 weeks into training and Chris is really weird about the whole thing, which is understandable.  I am still in the ‘increasing strength’ stage, but now I need to increase my mileage to easily tackle longer rides.  About 9 1/2 weeks to go, ahhh!!!

Happy Active Weekend! Any plans?

14 Comments »

  1. Great post! I hope we continue to learn more research on this topic. I’m so excited about Saturday! I was going to go to spin this morning but slept in…I should have joined you!
    Enjoy your Friday!

    Comment by Kristen (swanky dietitian) — March 19, 2010 @ 9:09 am

  2. Great info! I am gonna rest and run a 10K on Saturday……Have a great one 🙂

    Comment by kalli@fitandfortysomething — March 19, 2010 @ 9:19 am

  3. Interesting about the fat stuff, I couldn’t imagine that much fat.

    Have fun cosmic bowling.

    Comment by Melinda — March 19, 2010 @ 10:50 am

  4. I new I ate all this fat for a reason! ha ha great post I’ve always eaten healthy fats they make my skin so much better x x

    Comment by Tamizn — March 19, 2010 @ 1:58 pm

  5. OMG 50 miler, girl you are CA-razyyy.

    It makes sense that fat would be good for endurance athletes. They need to have a sustainable energy source as opposed to a quick burst of energy then crash later, as carbs (even complex ones) provide. Right? I could be off, haha but protein and fat I feel like are important to eat before a long workout, just not precisely before.

    Comment by Kelly (Local Foodie Fight) — March 19, 2010 @ 2:43 pm

  6. Kelly, Hey! Yes, healthy fats and high quality protein are very important for all athletes. I didn’t want to imply that fat was ‘bad’, just not beneficial for performance when in the 70% of calories range that fat-loading proposes. Carbohydrates are essential for endurance athletes especially during intense exercise because they can provide the proper and efficient energy that working muscles need. Protein and fat are digested more slowly and are great to have when there is an adequate time for digestion before a long workout, but during they can cause stomach upset in larger amounts. Those with reactive hypoglycemia may experience a crash and have to be more careful with how they fuel with carbs before 🙂 So yes, fat is very important 🙂 Thanks so much for your comment!

    Comment by Kristen :) — March 19, 2010 @ 7:24 pm

  7. Wow, interesting topic. I don’t do long endurance type events, but I know I do better all around with a good amount of healthy fat in my diet.
    Have a great weekend Kristen!

    Comment by Mo @ MommyRD — March 19, 2010 @ 2:44 pm

  8. yep interesting, have fun with swanky RD your amazing with your dedication to fitness

    Comment by rebecca — March 19, 2010 @ 7:40 pm

  9. […] fat loading for endurance athletes | eatingRD.com […]

    Pingback by Showing this Olde Towne East home – Sights and Sounds of Columbus … | Ohio Real Estate — March 19, 2010 @ 11:15 pm

  10. 50 miles! Wow! Have fun and enjoy your weekend 🙂

    Comment by Shannon — March 20, 2010 @ 5:16 am

  11. Yay, sounds like you’re gong to have a fun weekend!

    This may be a dumb dietetics student question :P, but is there any danger of ketosis with too much fat metabolism in the fat loaders? I agree, a moderate amount of healthy fat is essential to a good diet! 🙂

    Comment by Jessie — March 21, 2010 @ 4:36 am

  12. Thanks for this post, Kristen. I am learning more and more about sports nutrition as I get more questions from people and am forced to look up the answers. I bought the ADA sports nutrition book the other day, and I’ve been reading it and learning a TON of information. So I guess the bottom line is that CHO are always going to be the best source of fuel, unless you are really well trained, then MAYBE fat can surpass the benefits of CHO (or at least match them). I do have a question for you, that is somewhat random. Sometimes people will tell me that they run really slow so they burn fat, rather than carbs. They say they run slow for 45 minutes, rather than running at a faster pace, for 45 minutes, because they want to burn fat. To me that doesn’t make sense. I want to explain to them that if they run a bit faster, they will still burn fat AND more calories. But I don’t know how to explain that. Do oyu know what I mean? So many people have in their heads that low intensity=more fat burned. But to me that sounds counterproductive. Any thoughts?

    Comment by The Candid RD — March 21, 2010 @ 6:13 am

  13. Gina, I do know what you mean! It is counterproductive . . . It’s true that you burn predominately more fat than carbs at much lower intensities, but overall you burn more calories at higher intensities which essentially translates to more fat. You would have to run a heck of a lot longer at a lower intensity to burn the same amount of fat overall that you do at higher intensities. For example, you burn almost all fat when sitting at a desk all day, but that doesn’t do any good with fat or weight loss. Hope that helps, but it sounds like you already have it 🙂

    Comment by Kristen :) — March 21, 2010 @ 6:14 pm

  14. You know I have really been trying to figure out what works best for me. I know that I require a lot of carbs and some things say I should have less, but when I drop them my workouts and running seriously suffer. I can’t say I’ve really tried to up my fat at any point though, more protein..so this is something to consider

    Comment by RunToTheFinsih — March 24, 2010 @ 11:29 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress